Crowbar6753 Clyde1998 Crowbar6753 With our medical department getting busier by the week along with this insipid performance today i really don't fancy the gaffer on this one. Normally you would like to drop a few after such a performance, however, he really might not have much of a choice to choose from, so should be interesting.

Opportunity for a few of the U21 lads to stake a claim for the first team squad on a regular basis - thinking Spencer; Sackey; and Borgnis mostly.
Perhaps Osho could come back in to contention too now he’s able to start at that level again.
Howdy Clyde, indeed maybe we went a bit heavy on loanee's this Summer and sometimes you have to question their loyalty to the club and are they giving 100% every game? I do feel by having so many we have closed the pathway to some extent of our youngsters getting a chance for first team gametime which is sad as the academy is probably the main reason we are still alive as a club.
I like your call on Osho i really liked what i saw when he played and would benefit from a spell in the first team.
I think the biggest issue is none of the loanees have really added anything to the squad that a permanent signing or a youth product would've done.
I won't question their effort, as they all appear to be putting in effort on the pitch and I've got no idea what they're like in day-to-day training. They're certainly not going to run through a brick wall for the club though, in the same way a youth graduate might - the same could be said of players signed permanently by the club unless you manage to find that very rare character who'll do that anywhere.
Had we brought in four top level loanees, it would be less of an issue as to how many we've brought in. The problem at this level is you're only going to really get players who are just coming out of a Category One academy (O'Mahony; Doyle; Burns) or players deemed not good enough for Championship clubs (Jacob).
We've obviously got our own Category One academy, and although ours has been among the weakest in the league over the past few years, so I'd rather prioritise bringing our own players through. Perhaps there's been a determination the batch of young players we've got simply aren't going to make the grade, as we've sold a number and already brought through a lot of the better players in the past few seasons. We've seen with Garcia though, players can develop a lot simply by getting senior experience.
Another issue is of our signings, the loanees have been the youngest. That's the pool of players available, but it does mean the permanent signings we've made aren't going to be improving themselves (aside from perhaps Kyerewaa or Lane) as they're already at the age where they've likely peaked - Ritchie; Marriott; Williams are probably now going to be in decline (at least physically). We're not going to get the longer-term benefit of the development of these loanees.
Essentially with loan players, you need them to be good enough now - not have the potential to be good enough in one or two seasons. If O'Mahony; Doyle; and Burns were our young players coming through, they'd certainly be worth having in the squad as they'll improve with first team exposure. As they're not, it doesn't make sense to have them other than very temporarily plug some holes in the squad - like Doyle replacing Knibbs in the squad after a sale; Burns perhaps allowing Kanu to go out on loan himself; etc.
Jacob seems like someone we should be looking at replacing via a permanent signing in January or through promoting someone from the academy.
Osho has been injured, but he's certainly someone who looks like he has a positive future ahead of him - assuming he gets opportunities and has the right mentality. As you say, signing so many players may have closed off some of those need opportunities for these young players.
In some regards, I do wonder in what ways our restricted transfer situation has benefitted or hindered us - forcing us to bring through some young players we already had is one obvious benefit.