Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

640 posts
User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22219
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Royal Rother » 07 Aug 2009 16:46

Fact remains that I would have been surprised if Wolves had signed him when he has a troublesome groin injury.

User avatar
strap
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2802
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:06
Location: Gainsford End

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:01

Thaumagurist*
strap James Harper loves this club, lives and breathes it. Just wanted to see if the grass was any greener elsewhere .... oh, and it helps if you can pass the medical!

I suspect he will be around to badger Mr Mad for a testimonial at the end of next year. Personally have no issues with him. Always gives 100% and as others more qualified have said, he may well be better suited to a midfield that actually plays the ball, rather tyhan hoofs it over his head. Whatever you think of Judas and Sir Steve, they both held him in high regard, and they are generally considered to be better judges of footballers than we mere scribblers.


Who are you referring to as Judas? Alan Pardew, I hope?


Sorry, is there any other? Should have said Parjudas.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:03

rabidbee
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


The newspaper article or whatever it was pretty much implied it, though, didn't it?


I didn't think so particularly.

User avatar
strap
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2802
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:06
Location: Gainsford End

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:04

Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Ian - Whether they ever got round to talking about personal terms I can't say, but the cause of the collapse was the fact he failed his medical. HTH.

Actually just been told I'm talking bollox (ha, no change there then!). Current scan of Harps' groin and suggested there was a difference of opinion as to when he'd be available for selection. Since Doyler is still crocked, and Hahnemann is carrying a hip injury, guess Wolves didn't fancy a third exRFC crock on the wage bill!!

Be funny if he gets a half hour v Forest on Saturday! Wonder if McCarthy will be at the Mad Stad with his cheque book!?
Last edited by strap on 07 Aug 2009 17:42, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:07

strap
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Ian - Whether they ever got round to talking about personal terms I can't say, but the cause of the collapse was the fact he failed his medical. HTH.



You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.


User avatar
strap
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2802
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:06
Location: Gainsford End

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:43

Ian Royal
strap
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Ian - Whether they ever got round to talking about personal terms I can't say, but the cause of the collapse was the fact he failed his medical. HTH.



You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.


Please yourself fella. Only passing on what little knowledge I have.

readingbedding
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4396
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 21:10
Location: cutting them all away for four runs

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by readingbedding » 07 Aug 2009 17:46

It doesn't sound as though your source is on the sauce.
Sounds perfectly plausible to me.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:54

strap
Ian Royal You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.


Please yourself fella. Only passing on what little knowledge I have.


You haven't even said you've got a source, let alone who or what it is. Do you expect people to just blindly accept everything you say?

juanpablo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1010
Joined: 12 May 2004 17:50
Location: on a beach with jack johnson

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by juanpablo » 07 Aug 2009 20:27

Ian Royal
strap
Ian Royal You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.


Please yourself fella. Only passing on what little knowledge I have.


You haven't even said you've got a source, let alone who or what it is. Do you expect people to just blindly accept everything you say?



considering the absolute crap he posts that would be quite a reach


loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by loyalroyal4life » 07 Aug 2009 21:15

Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Indeed it could well be that MM wouldnt allow him to room with doyler and said he had to go with USA

User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by SteveRoyal » 07 Aug 2009 22:13

loyalroyal4life
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Indeed it could well be that MM wouldnt allow him to room with doyler and said he had to go with USA

Marek Matejovsky say whaa?

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3999
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by rabidbee » 07 Aug 2009 22:33

Ian Royal
rabidbee The newspaper article or whatever it was pretty much implied it, though, didn't it?


I didn't think so particularly.


The Express and Star McCarthy refused to say why the deal hadn’t gone through, but Harper is known to have aggravated a groin injury that he tore in April.


"Off the record, Mick?..."

loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by loyalroyal4life » 07 Aug 2009 22:40

SteveRoyal
loyalroyal4life
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.

The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.


Indeed it could well be that MM wouldnt allow him to room with doyler and said he had to go with USA

Marek Matejovsky say whaa?



Mick McCarthy


Harps will be off on a free in the summer imo


IMAMATEOFJOVSKY
Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 03 Feb 2008 13:42

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 09 Aug 2009 15:40

Initial rumour was that deal broke down due to medical (according to some on here)

According to todays paper (albeit redtop) the deal broke down because they couldnt agree personal terms - is that Harper being too greedy or McCarthy being too tight - Surely he would have earned more going to Wolves

Does anyone know which of these is the most likely?

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 15:49

IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Initial rumour was that deal broke down due to medical (according to some on here)

According to todays paper (albeit redtop) the deal broke down because they couldnt agree personal terms - is that Harper being too greedy or McCarthy being too tight - Surely he would have earned more going to Wolves

Does anyone know which of these is the most likely?


Well he played against Chelsea and was on the bench against Forest, which makes his groin injury pretty unlikely IMO.

I think it's just a case that they (Harper) decided it wasn't the right move.

tilehurstender
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 22:26

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by tilehurstender » 09 Aug 2009 21:00

Harper thought it was a done deal and came in to say his goodbyes

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by southbank1871 » 10 Aug 2009 09:08

It was down to his groin problem that the move didn't go ahead apparently.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Hoop Blah » 10 Aug 2009 10:24

IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Initial rumour was that deal broke down due to medical (according to some on here)

According to todays paper (albeit redtop) the deal broke down because they couldnt agree personal terms - is that Harper being too greedy or McCarthy being too tight - Surely he would have earned more going to Wolves

Does anyone know which of these is the most likely?


He might've earned more going to Wolves, almost certainly, but that doesn't mean it was enough for Harper to up sticks and leave a club and a town he's very settled at (maybe too settled perhaps?).

I don't think it was the medical that caused the move to fall through.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Royal Lady » 10 Aug 2009 11:05

southbank1871 It was down to his groin problem that the move didn't go ahead apparently.
I don't suppose you'd happen to know if it is a long term injury then SB1871. Just to vindicate my initial comments and shut Sun Tzu up for once.

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Rumour: James Harper (talks with Wolves confirmed)

by Thaumagurist* » 10 Aug 2009 11:10

Royal Lady
southbank1871 It was down to his groin problem that the move didn't go ahead apparently.
I don't suppose you'd happen to know if it is a long term injury then SB1871. Just to vindicate my initial comments and shut Sun Tzu up for once.

If he really has a long term injury, then why was he on the bench on Saturday?

640 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ark Royal, Bing [Bot], Broxroyal, GURoyal, Royals and Racers and 206 guests

It is currently 12 Jul 2025 14:33