by Royal Rother » 07 Aug 2009 16:46
by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:01
Thaumagurist*strap James Harper loves this club, lives and breathes it. Just wanted to see if the grass was any greener elsewhere .... oh, and it helps if you can pass the medical!
I suspect he will be around to badger Mr Mad for a testimonial at the end of next year. Personally have no issues with him. Always gives 100% and as others more qualified have said, he may well be better suited to a midfield that actually plays the ball, rather tyhan hoofs it over his head. Whatever you think of Judas and Sir Steve, they both held him in high regard, and they are generally considered to be better judges of footballers than we mere scribblers.
Who are you referring to as Judas? Alan Pardew, I hope?
by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:03
rabidbeeIan Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
The newspaper article or whatever it was pretty much implied it, though, didn't it?
by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:04
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:07
strapIan Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
Ian - Whether they ever got round to talking about personal terms I can't say, but the cause of the collapse was the fact he failed his medical. HTH.
by strap » 07 Aug 2009 17:43
Ian RoyalstrapIan Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
Ian - Whether they ever got round to talking about personal terms I can't say, but the cause of the collapse was the fact he failed his medical. HTH.
You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.
by readingbedding » 07 Aug 2009 17:46
by Ian Royal » 07 Aug 2009 17:54
strapIan Royal You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.
Please yourself fella. Only passing on what little knowledge I have.
by juanpablo » 07 Aug 2009 20:27
Ian RoyalstrapIan Royal You telling me doesn't make it true you know...
It may be, but I've read the article specifically looking for references to failed medicals and there was nothing specific there.
Please yourself fella. Only passing on what little knowledge I have.
You haven't even said you've got a source, let alone who or what it is. Do you expect people to just blindly accept everything you say?
by loyalroyal4life » 07 Aug 2009 21:15
Ian Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
by SteveRoyal » 07 Aug 2009 22:13
loyalroyal4lifeIan Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
Indeed it could well be that MM wouldnt allow him to room with doyler and said he had to go with USA
by rabidbee » 07 Aug 2009 22:33
Ian Royalrabidbee The newspaper article or whatever it was pretty much implied it, though, didn't it?
I didn't think so particularly.
The Express and Star McCarthy refused to say why the deal hadn’t gone through, but Harper is known to have aggravated a groin injury that he tore in April.
by loyalroyal4life » 07 Aug 2009 22:40
SteveRoyalloyalroyal4lifeIan Royal May I remind you all that it hasn't actually been said that the deal is a dead duck due to the groin injury. Someone has just suggested the medical may have been failed, probably because we all know that he is struggling a little with it.
The cause of the collapse of the deal (described as 50/50 by Rodgers before Harper went up there) could be any number of reasons.
Indeed it could well be that MM wouldnt allow him to room with doyler and said he had to go with USA
Marek Matejovsky say whaa?
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 09 Aug 2009 15:40
by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 15:49
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Initial rumour was that deal broke down due to medical (according to some on here)
According to todays paper (albeit redtop) the deal broke down because they couldnt agree personal terms - is that Harper being too greedy or McCarthy being too tight - Surely he would have earned more going to Wolves
Does anyone know which of these is the most likely?
by tilehurstender » 09 Aug 2009 21:00
by southbank1871 » 10 Aug 2009 09:08
by Hoop Blah » 10 Aug 2009 10:24
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Initial rumour was that deal broke down due to medical (according to some on here)
According to todays paper (albeit redtop) the deal broke down because they couldnt agree personal terms - is that Harper being too greedy or McCarthy being too tight - Surely he would have earned more going to Wolves
Does anyone know which of these is the most likely?
by Royal Lady » 10 Aug 2009 11:05
I don't suppose you'd happen to know if it is a long term injury then SB1871. Just to vindicate my initial comments and shut Sun Tzu up for once.southbank1871 It was down to his groin problem that the move didn't go ahead apparently.
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Aug 2009 11:10
Royal LadyI don't suppose you'd happen to know if it is a long term injury then SB1871. Just to vindicate my initial comments and shut Sun Tzu up for once.southbank1871 It was down to his groin problem that the move didn't go ahead apparently.
Users browsing this forum: Ark Royal, Bing [Bot], Broxroyal, GURoyal, Royals and Racers and 206 guests