Baines Bloody hell you're an idiot, Ian.
Mags got it spot on IMO.
which post???
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 30 Dec 2009 17:08
Baines Bloody hell you're an idiot, Ian.
Mags got it spot on IMO.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Dec 2009 17:13
The whole year inn The millions he wasted on bench warmers and the reliance on Coppell signings did not help
by RoyalBlue » 30 Dec 2009 17:19
Hoop BlahThe whole year inn The millions he wasted on bench warmers and the reliance on Coppell signings did not help
He was criticised on here for deliberately NOT playing Coppell signings at the start of the season! With a limit chance to bring in new players, and one spectaular cock up in the Smith saga, what else could he do?
The millions wasted being the one signing I take it? I don't know how much Cummings cost, but I don't think it would've been a significant amount in the general scheme of things...could be wrong there though. So thats Mills and Cummings plus a loan signing that he bought in and didn't start. His other signings have all come good haven't they?
Bertrand
Rasiack
McAnuff
Howard
As I think I said earlier today, all managers make errors in the transfer market, and I still think Mills will probably come good in the long term if given the chance and the right partner alongside him. Interesting point someone else made was that Mills may also have been someone the club had lined up already, so not totally a Rodgers purchase.
by The whole year inn » 30 Dec 2009 17:19
Hoop BlahThe whole year inn The millions he wasted on bench warmers and the reliance on Coppell signings did not help
He was criticised on here for deliberately NOT playing Coppell signings at the start of the season! With a limit chance to bring in new players, and one spectaular cock up in the Smith saga, what else could he do?
by Hoop Blah » 30 Dec 2009 17:25
The whole year innHoop BlahThe whole year inn The millions he wasted on bench warmers and the reliance on Coppell signings did not help
He was criticised on here for deliberately NOT playing Coppell signings at the start of the season! With a limit chance to bring in new players, and one spectaular cock up in the Smith saga, what else could he do?
The smith saga was his making - he acted like a total fool and we lost out on a good player due to his mouth
Mills - bench
Cummings - bench
It is hard not to sign a decent striker when you have money - just go through the scoring charts and anyone you sign will score goals
by facaldaqui » 30 Dec 2009 17:29
Hoop Blah The losses to the squad were massive and that was from a squad that failed to win at home for 4 months, amassing a massive 20 points from the last 17 games. To take out a large chunk of that first team squad, including some of it's best players, and ask for much more than what was delivered is a bit unrealistic.
by The whole year inn » 30 Dec 2009 17:36
by Hoop Blah » 30 Dec 2009 17:38
by Hoop Blah » 30 Dec 2009 17:42
The whole year inn Cummings was a big gaff
(Mills) holding him back but I've no idea what.
The Smith saga was largely his fault yes
------------------------------------------
all that in 5 months, and how much money spent? Why should JM let that go on?
by The whole year inn » 30 Dec 2009 17:43
by AthleticoSpizz » 30 Dec 2009 17:49
The whole year inn Rodgers would still be in a job if he could keep his mouth shut and played his signings
by Mr Angry » 30 Dec 2009 17:50
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 30 Dec 2009 17:58
by AthleticoSpizz » 30 Dec 2009 18:00
and what a difference that extra point would've made to the sitution that we are in now!.Mr Angry Whoever made the decision not to strengthen the squad during the Summer between our 2 seasons in the premier; I doubt that Hammond was to blame - it was either Sir Steve (over loyal to his existing squad) or SJM (why splash the cash when we finished 8th?).
Not replacing Sidwell, not bringing in a right winger, and not bringing in new players who would push the established players for the shirt (especially - but not exclusively - Shorey) were what stuffed us up as it was a policy that was always going to catch up on us; any of the above may well have gained us the extra point, or even helped to reduce the goal difference by the 2 which eventually relegated us.
by Mr Angry » 30 Dec 2009 18:01
Harpers So Solid Crew Happy New Year Mr A
by AthleticoSpizz » 30 Dec 2009 18:05
Harpers So Solid Crew Happy New Year Mr A
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 30 Dec 2009 18:57
Hoop BlahThe whole year inn The millions he wasted on bench warmers and the reliance on Coppell signings did not help
He was criticised on here for deliberately NOT playing Coppell signings at the start of the season! With a limit chance to bring in new players, and one spectaular cock up in the Smith saga, what else could he do?
The millions wasted being the one signing I take it? I don't know how much Cummings cost, but I don't think it would've been a significant amount in the general scheme of things...could be wrong there though. So thats Mills and Cummings plus a loan signing that he bought in and didn't start. His other signings have all come good haven't they?
Bertrand
Rasiack
McAnuff
Howard
As I think I said earlier today, all managers make errors in the transfer market, and I still think Mills will probably come good in the long term if given the chance and the right partner alongside him. Interesting point someone else made was that Mills may also have been someone the club had lined up already, so not totally a Rodgers purchase.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 30 Dec 2009 18:59
Mr Angry Whoever made the decision not to strengthen the squad during the Summer between our 2 seasons in the premier; I doubt that Hammond was to blame - it was either Sir Steve (over loyal to his existing squad) or SJM (why splash the cash when we finished 8th?).
Not replacing Sidwell, not bringing in a right winger, and not bringing in new players who would push the established players for the shirt (especially - but not exclusively - Shorey) were what stuffed us up as it was a policy that was always going to catch up on us; any of the above may well have gained us the extra point, or even helped to reduce the goal difference by the 2 which eventually relegated us.
by Arch » 30 Dec 2009 19:03
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeMr Angry Whoever made the decision not to strengthen the squad during the Summer between our 2 seasons in the premier; I doubt that Hammond was to blame - it was either Sir Steve (over loyal to his existing squad) or SJM (why splash the cash when we finished 8th?).
Not replacing Sidwell, not bringing in a right winger, and not bringing in new players who would push the established players for the shirt (especially - but not exclusively - Shorey) were what stuffed us up as it was a policy that was always going to catch up on us; any of the above may well have gained us the extra point, or even helped to reduce the goal difference by the 2 which eventually relegated us.
The lump on my head still hasn't gone down from banging my head against a large brick wall that season. It's still a joke imo and why Coppell in my eyes un did all the great work he had done.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 30 Dec 2009 19:08
ArchSmoking Kills Dancing DoeMr Angry Whoever made the decision not to strengthen the squad during the Summer between our 2 seasons in the premier; I doubt that Hammond was to blame - it was either Sir Steve (over loyal to his existing squad) or SJM (why splash the cash when we finished 8th?).
Not replacing Sidwell, not bringing in a right winger, and not bringing in new players who would push the established players for the shirt (especially - but not exclusively - Shorey) were what stuffed us up as it was a policy that was always going to catch up on us; any of the above may well have gained us the extra point, or even helped to reduce the goal difference by the 2 which eventually relegated us.
The lump on my head still hasn't gone down from banging my head against a large brick wall that season. It's still a joke imo and why Coppell in my eyes un did all the great work he had done.
Coppell's great weakness was believing players would come good, whether it be Long, Oster, Marek, or whoever. Another weakness was not taking charge of transfer matters. He let himself be told Fae was the real deal on inadequate evidence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 150 guests