by brendywendy » 14 Jan 2010 11:21
by readingbedding » 14 Jan 2010 11:22
by Archie's penalty » 14 Jan 2010 11:26
by papereyes » 14 Jan 2010 11:33
by Vision » 14 Jan 2010 11:34
by Ian Royal » 14 Jan 2010 11:45
by Maguire » 14 Jan 2010 11:47
brendywendy turned the game for us yesterday- hes had well deserved criticism this season, and many doubted him
but fair play- the lad came up trumps tonight, winning the pen, and scoring a great header.
more of that please shane
by Alan Partridge » 14 Jan 2010 11:49
Maguirebrendywendy turned the game for us yesterday- hes had well deserved criticism this season, and many doubted him
but fair play- the lad came up trumps tonight, winning the pen, and scoring a great header.
more of that please shane
Yeah he dived for a pen then got given cross of the century to score from.
He's still a lazy fat-arsed gap-toothed shithead
by Ferris » 14 Jan 2010 11:56
by Wycombe Royal » 14 Jan 2010 11:57
Alan Partridge He couldn't miss, the cross was so good, any contact takes it in.
by Archie's penalty » 14 Jan 2010 11:57
by Maguire » 14 Jan 2010 12:00
Wycombe RoyalAlan Partridge He couldn't miss, the cross was so good, any contact takes it in.
Bit like the cross to Rasiak, the cross to Church and the cross to Ingimarsson. One missed by a mile from a couple of yards out, one failed to connect, and the other put it wide of the post.
THat chance wasn't as easy to finish as Long made it look. He needed a glancing header angled downwards. It wouldn'thave taken much for him to have got too little on it (thus missing the far post) or too much on it (sending it straight at the keeper).
Sometimes you just need to give credit where it is due.
by Alan Partridge » 14 Jan 2010 12:01
Wycombe RoyalAlan Partridge He couldn't miss, the cross was so good, any contact takes it in.
Bit like the cross to Rasiak, the cross to Church and the cross to Ingimarsson. One missed by a mile from a couple of yards out, one failed to connect, and the other put it wide of the post.
THat chance wasn't as easy to finish as Long made it look. He needed a glancing header angled downwards. It wouldn'thave taken much for him to have got too little on it (thus missing the far post) or too much on it (sending it straight at the keeper).
Sometimes you just need to give credit where it is due.
by readingbedding » 14 Jan 2010 12:02
by Wax Jacket » 14 Jan 2010 12:04
by Wycombe Royal » 14 Jan 2010 12:05
Maguire Err, LOL
Headers don't come any easier than that - perfect cross, bang on your head a few yards out, unmarked, don't even have to jump, whole goal to aim at.
If you think the other chances were as easy as that then i'm afraid you just don't know anything about football.
by readingbedding » 14 Jan 2010 12:07
by The Rouge » 14 Jan 2010 12:09
MaguireWycombe RoyalAlan Partridge He couldn't miss, the cross was so good, any contact takes it in.
Bit like the cross to Rasiak, the cross to Church and the cross to Ingimarsson. One missed by a mile from a couple of yards out, one failed to connect, and the other put it wide of the post.
THat chance wasn't as easy to finish as Long made it look. He needed a glancing header angled downwards. It wouldn'thave taken much for him to have got too little on it (thus missing the far post) or too much on it (sending it straight at the keeper).
Sometimes you just need to give credit where it is due.
Err, LOL
Headers don't come any easier than that - perfect cross, bang on your head a few yards out, unmarked, don't even have to jump, whole goal to aim at.
If you think the other chances were as easy as that then i'm afraid you just don't know anything about football.
by Archie's penalty » 14 Jan 2010 12:09
by papereyes » 14 Jan 2010 12:13
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 341 guests