by Schards#2 » 26 Feb 2009 12:43
by T.R.O.L.I. » 26 Feb 2009 12:48
by CMRoyal » 26 Feb 2009 12:58
Schards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Sun Tzu » 26 Feb 2009 13:03
by Alan Partridge » 26 Feb 2009 13:40
T.R.O.L.I. 'greed, Schards.
And to think people on here were worried about WoLOLves beating our 106 point record
by Hoop Blah » 26 Feb 2009 13:46
by Sun Tzu » 26 Feb 2009 13:47
Hoop Blah I'm sure someone in Sunderland probably said exactly the same thing a few years ago!
Records are there to be broken, and whilst it will take something very special to beat it I wouldn't rule it out.
by Snowball » 26 Feb 2009 15:27
Schards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Mr Angry » 26 Feb 2009 16:10
SnowballSchards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Snowball » 26 Feb 2009 16:59
by The whole year inn » 01 Mar 2009 03:50
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 10:04
by Gunny Fishcake » 01 Mar 2009 10:08
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 10:13
by Schards#2 » 01 Mar 2009 10:22
readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
by Platypuss » 01 Mar 2009 13:03
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 13:06
by The 17 Bus » 01 Mar 2009 13:08
Schards#2readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
You don't find it surprising that a team that hasn't had a player score for 9 hours are favourites to win the division?
I would guess that this scenario has never happened before in the history of football.
Gunny Fishcake is right, it's a bad bunch. I'm far from convinced we are the best of it though.
by Royal Rother » 01 Mar 2009 13:13
Indeed. Everyone knows that when you make new signings, just slot 'em in and watch the surge in form - it's always worked that way hasn't it?What a ridiculous division. A few well-chosen signings in January to correct a couple of obvious deficiencies and we'd be home and hosed by now.
by PEARCEY » 01 Mar 2009 13:18
The 17 BusSchards#2readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
You don't find it surprising that a team that hasn't had a player score for 9 hours are favourites to win the division?
I would guess that this scenario has never happened before in the history of football.
Gunny Fishcake is right, it's a bad bunch. I'm far from convinced we are the best of it though.
third best at the moment, and probably the most bizarre season I have ever seen with us in it, you often see one fall apart, Watford last season, but to have the top 3 in the bottom of the current form like this is astonishing. ANd no one is really coming up to the top ala Palace the other year from the bottom at Xmas.