by Y25 » 05 Jul 2009 10:23
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Jul 2009 11:35
by Ginger_Blitz » 05 Jul 2009 22:25
by floyd__streete » 05 Jul 2009 23:50
The Cap You're not wrong bigmike.I bought a couple of tickets today and matey behind the counter said they'd sold shy of 2,000.Parky had a fair send off in his testimonial match, so why not Murts?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Jul 2009 08:55
by shaka's shorts » 06 Jul 2009 10:08
by urz_1871 » 06 Jul 2009 10:18
shaka's shorts it is top story on OS now. If they could say some of the names who might play it would help to sell some tickets....or if we announced a new signing that people could see for the first time.....
by Silver Fox » 06 Jul 2009 10:26
Huntley & PalmerSilver Fox I'm going, but only because we're in hospitality. I think I might be too embarassed to ask Murts a question afterwards
Cheers for the invite then.
by bigmike » 06 Jul 2009 11:19
floyd__streeteThe Cap You're not wrong bigmike.I bought a couple of tickets today and matey behind the counter said they'd sold shy of 2,000.Parky had a fair send off in his testimonial match, so why not Murts?
To be fair, the Parky testimonial was right at the end of a successful season, we were presented with the Div 2 runner-up shield that night and the quality of opposition - household names in an ex-England XI remember - was far superior to what we will see on July 20th. Gazza or John Halls? The latter will really pull in the floating voters. So we're left with third-rate opposition on a daft date as Finerain alludes to and there will be an embarassingly poor turn-out for one of our club's best ever servants. Poor form, RFC
.
Why could the Chelsea match not have been made the testimonial anyway? I am sure that some drone will make some sort of sniffy response about this match being important pre-season preperation, as if Reading aren't going to be given an absolute pasting by Chelsea anyway regardless of whether we give Murty 15 minutes at the end of a 5-1 defeat.
by Royal Lady » 06 Jul 2009 11:27
by Thaumagurist* » 06 Jul 2009 11:31
bigmike I think it was bad form for septic to ask for the money that they did. Murts wants to make as much cash for swings and smiles as possible and if the match against septic went ahead it would have cost him money..
by Dirk Gently » 06 Jul 2009 11:35
bigmike I think it was bad form for septic to ask for the money that they did. Murts wants to make as much cash for swings and smiles as possible and if the match against septic went ahead it would have cost him money..
by georgerob » 06 Jul 2009 12:03
by bigmike » 06 Jul 2009 12:35
Dirk Gentlybigmike I think it was bad form for septic to ask for the money that they did. Murts wants to make as much cash for swings and smiles as possible and if the match against septic went ahead it would have cost him money..
All "big" clubs will ask for a guarantee of a minmum income from the gate before they'll play at a "smaller" club in a friendly - you can be sure Chelsea will be doing exactly the same.
But it wasn't actually Celtic's guarantee which scuppered a Celtic match - it was the bill for policing which was quoted by TVP!
It also didn't help that for so long we didn't know which league we'd be playing in this season, so that confused the match scheduling.
by Dirk Gently » 06 Jul 2009 12:39
bigmikeDirk Gentlybigmike I think it was bad form for septic to ask for the money that they did. Murts wants to make as much cash for swings and smiles as possible and if the match against septic went ahead it would have cost him money..
All "big" clubs will ask for a guarantee of a minmum income from the gate before they'll play at a "smaller" club in a friendly - you can be sure Chelsea will be doing exactly the same.
But it wasn't actually Celtic's guarantee which scuppered a Celtic match - it was the bill for policing which was quoted by TVP!
It also didn't help that for so long we didn't know which league we'd be playing in this season, so that confused the match scheduling.
I think the £120000 that Septic were asking for was a one of the major factors that it was scrapped
by Shaka's Giant Hands » 06 Jul 2009 12:46
by Royal Lady » 06 Jul 2009 13:01
by bigmike » 06 Jul 2009 13:05
Dirk Gently
Do you have a source for that figure?
by Shaka's Giant Hands » 06 Jul 2009 13:06
Royal Lady Mr Mad doesn't like testimonials does he, even when a significant proportion of the money is going to charity it now seems.
by Sun Tzu » 06 Jul 2009 13:21
Shaka's Giant Hands I genuinely feel for Murts at the moment. He is probably one of the most honest and approachable footballers in 'the modern game' and it just appears that the testimonial match is a bit of a chore that needs to be done and got out the way.
Shocking way for the club to treat arguable the greatest captain and in my eyes the club aren't really bothered that it will be a limp end to his time here.
Users browsing this forum: Number 9, Royals and Racers and 471 guests