by cmonurz » 27 Jun 2010 16:11
by PEARCEY » 27 Jun 2010 16:12
cmonurz The ref was 2 yards behind Lampard and the linesman was 15 yds out. They should have the abilty to see that goal. It was obvious watching it live that it was over the line. Sepp BLOLatter.
by EPR » 27 Jun 2010 16:13
by NR_Royal » 27 Jun 2010 16:14
by Row Z Royal » 27 Jun 2010 16:19
by Wycombe Royal » 27 Jun 2010 16:23
Row Z Royal What happens when it goes against us? Then everyone who clamoured for the use of the technology will be complaining the other way.
Leave things as they are because mistakes and argument will never be removed from the game. It's one of the reasons that I love this bloody sport!
by Dirk Gently » 27 Jun 2010 16:27
Wycombe RoyalRow Z Royal What happens when it goes against us? Then everyone who clamoured for the use of the technology will be complaining the other way.
Leave things as they are because mistakes and argument will never be removed from the game. It's one of the reasons that I love this bloody sport!
Most of those who are against technology, myself included, are not against it for the black and white decision of whether a ball crossed a line. That can do done without the use of cameras by just having a chip in the ball and sensors in the goal.
I am against it for the more grey areas like penalty decisions, violent conduct, etc......
Dirk Gently I'm definitely in favour of using technology for line decisions - with the proviso that the ref has a instantaneous alert if the ball is over the line.
But everything else (fouls, handballs, even off-sides) are subjective - when you consider that things like intent have to be taken into considerations they're all matters of opinion, which two people might see in different ways even with the best technology in the world. The "wisdom of crowds" doesn't apply if you just add a couple of people looking at replays - you need lots of people before it applies, so whilst we have a small team of people whose job it is to give opinions on the decisions then that's fine by me.
Anything that stops a game and potentially takes it back on a matter of opinion will irrevocably change the game for the worse, IMHO>
by exileinleeds » 27 Jun 2010 16:29
by Flyingkiwi » 27 Jun 2010 16:30
by Flyingkiwi » 27 Jun 2010 16:40
Ideal So you missed the fact that he only had to chase Klose because Terry ran 10 yards upfield and miscalculated where the ball went completely?
Should have been an easy headed clearance, but he made a mess of it and it gifted Germany a goal.
by Flyingkiwi » 27 Jun 2010 16:45
by frimmers3 » 27 Jun 2010 16:45
by PlasticRoyale » 27 Jun 2010 16:48
by Flyingkiwi » 27 Jun 2010 16:48
frimmers3 terry....awful. abject.
by comeonyouroyals » 27 Jun 2010 16:48
by Jerry St Clair » 27 Jun 2010 16:50
comeonyouroyals So Heskey on when we need goals, this is almost past horrible to funny now.
by Wycombe Royal » 27 Jun 2010 16:50
by Flyingkiwi » 27 Jun 2010 16:53
Jerry St Claircomeonyouroyals So Heskey on when we need goals, this is almost past horrible to funny now.
The best way to deal with this is to just LOL.
The thing is, this shower will return to their clubs afterwards and be lauded as heroes despite it.
by comeonyouroyals » 27 Jun 2010 16:57
FlyingkiwiJerry St Claircomeonyouroyals So Heskey on when we need goals, this is almost past horrible to funny now.
The best way to deal with this is to just LOL.
The thing is, this shower will return to their clubs afterwards and be lauded as heroes despite it.
I don't think that will happen (even with the Chelsea plastics). This is John Terry's last game for England, regardless!
by frimmers3 » 27 Jun 2010 16:57
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests