by Royal Lady » 14 Feb 2011 17:39
by PEARCEY » 14 Feb 2011 17:44
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 14 Feb 2011 17:45
by Svlad Cjelli » 14 Feb 2011 17:48
Royal Lady Keep hold of your best players for a quick return to the Prem.
We gambled in this exact way and lost. That's where the parachute payment went
Sorry to harp on, but no way did ALL of our parachute paymentS pay for the wages to keep hold of our best players.
I'm talking about ALL of our parachute payments here.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 14 Feb 2011 17:55
by T.R.O.L.I. » 14 Feb 2011 18:03
Harpers So Solid Crew didn't we use it to pay the overdraft off?
by ZacNaloen » 14 Feb 2011 18:04
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2011 18:30
Royal Lady Keep hold of your best players for a quick return to the Prem.
We gambled in this exact way and lost. That's where the parachute payment went
Sorry to harp on, but no way did ALL of our parachute paymentS pay for the wages to keep hold of our best players.
I'm talking about ALL of our parachute payments here.
by Royal Lady » 14 Feb 2011 18:32
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 14 Feb 2011 18:34
Royal Lady If you think that ALL the parachute payments we received over 3 or 4 years or whatever it's been ALL went on keeping our best players - you're seriously deluded!!
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2011 18:35
Royal Lady If you think that ALL the parachute payments we received over 3 or 4 years or whatever it's been ALL went on keeping our best players - you're seriously deluded!!
by Royal Lady » 14 Feb 2011 18:36
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2011 18:38
Royal Lady We had parachute payments going UP to Prem and parachute payments going DOWN. I've been talking about ALL the parachute payments. But I give up.
by Royal Lady » 14 Feb 2011 18:47
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2011 18:49
Royal Lady Yeah, I meant the extra money we got for going up and the money we got in TV revenue - soz that I lumped it all in as "parachute" payments.
by Royal Lady » 14 Feb 2011 18:51
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2011 18:59
Royal Lady This is what I don't understand - when we went up, we must have known the approximate amounts we would be getting in extra money - so why did we increase our wage bill so exhorbitantly?
by Svlad Cjelli » 14 Feb 2011 19:51
Royal Lady This is what I don't understand - when we went up, we must have known the approximate amounts we would be getting in extra money - so why did we increase our wage bill so exhorbitantly?
by Hoop Blah » 14 Feb 2011 20:07
Royal Lady This is what I don't understand - when we went up, we must have known the approximate amounts we would be getting in extra money - so why did we increase our wage bill so exhorbitantly?
by PEARCEY » 14 Feb 2011 20:09
Svlad CjelliRoyal Lady This is what I don't understand - when we went up, we must have known the approximate amounts we would be getting in extra money - so why did we increase our wage bill so exhorbitantly?
It was a most uncharacteristic "gamble" on getting back up in that first season. Keep the likes of Doyle, Hunt, Shorey and go for it.
SC can be very persuasive when he's got a couple of hundred people in his car park space chanting his name - I think everyone more or less got carried away with the emotion that week and thought "we'll go for it for a year".
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 332 guests