by General B » 17 Jul 2012 14:20
by Maguire » 17 Jul 2012 14:22
starliaison The one thing that should unite us is Reading FC but it seems to divide us as there are so many ideas on what is best for the club.
by southbank1871 » 17 Jul 2012 14:22
by Big Foot » 17 Jul 2012 14:23
southbank1871 Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 17 Jul 2012 14:25
by strap » 17 Jul 2012 14:26
moonwalklikebasTBMThe Rouge 4. Are these guys a bunch of helmets?TBM
Naaaaaa!
Looks like a 80's Book club. Not one of a forward thinking modern football club.
by Silver Fox » 17 Jul 2012 14:28
southbank1871 Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
by cmonurz » 17 Jul 2012 14:28
by Blakey's Right Peg » 17 Jul 2012 14:30
southbank1871 Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jul 2012 14:31
starliaison At the moment I am the only STAR board member willing to even post on here.
by southbank1871 » 17 Jul 2012 14:32
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jul 2012 14:33
southbank1871 Mags for STAR?
by STAR Liaison » 17 Jul 2012 14:34
southbank1871 However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
by southbank1871 » 17 Jul 2012 14:36
by southbank1871 » 17 Jul 2012 14:36
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 17 Jul 2012 14:38
by STAR Liaison » 17 Jul 2012 14:41
Hoop Blahstarliaison At the moment I am the only STAR board member willing to even post on here.
Well there's a blindingly obvious weakness in your organisation I'm afraid STAR. This board may have it's fair share of idiots, WUMs and posters who don't actively watch the team play that often these days but it remains the largest and most active place for dicussion on all things RFC. If STAR don't recognise that and embrace it as the most popular and, believe it or not, representative place for fans to dicuss the progress, successes, failures and issues relating to the club and it's supporter base (that's the one the STAR board have pledged to represent and effectively work for) then it's perfectly understandable the criticism you're having to take.
The only other places that come close to this are Twitter and I guess the Facebook pages, but from what I've seen they're an even smaller pool of similar contributors
Have you guys tried recruiting a more representative cross section of support onto the board? Perhaps there should be a drive to encourage a member or two from your ranks with a more positive HNA perception to step up to a board position and engage with the forum some more. It's a massive communication problem if STAR fail to engage with this place. Perhaps you could even have a discussion about co-opting a reliable and forthright NHA contributor onto your board to give the place a voice in your organisation.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jul 2012 14:41
starliaisonsouthbank1871 However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
I have apologised and Cypry and I have had a conversation (where I got the pm right!) that has sorted things out.
by Royal With Cheese » 17 Jul 2012 14:41
by TFF » 17 Jul 2012 14:46
starliaison Of course it would mean outing them
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests