by Green » 05 Oct 2012 14:39
by wolsey » 05 Oct 2012 14:49
by Tony Le Mesmer » 05 Oct 2012 14:51
Green I dunno, this kind of argument rears its ugly head with athletic tracks every so often.
I just don't think its worth the sacrifice of having the fans so far from the pitch.
by Green » 05 Oct 2012 15:20
by Tony Le Mesmer » 05 Oct 2012 16:15
Green I think you're being unfair there Tony - these proposals haven't come from AFCW, they've come from the owners of Plough Lane, who're presumably only concerned with financials.
by SWLR » 05 Oct 2012 16:41
wolsey An (admittedly irrelevant) question based purely on geographical ignorance:
Is Romford viewed less London than Wimbledon? Always thought of them as a bit, well, hinterland.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Oct 2012 20:35
Tony Le MesmerGreen I think you're being unfair there Tony - these proposals haven't come from AFCW, they've come from the owners of Plough Lane, who're presumably only concerned with financials.
OK, im not aware of the details, but surely 2 tenants are better than 1 from a financial point of view?
by Jackson Corner » 06 Oct 2012 01:08
GreenJackson Corner What happened to the old Plough Lane ground in the end?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelhut/2793135762/
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], South Coast Royal and 90 guests