Extended-Phenotype wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Extended-Phenotype wrote:I wonder if it is intellectually possible for people to criticise/defend Adkins without mentioning McDermott as if the success, failure, opinion and appointment of either is intrinsically linked with the other?
I bet it isn't.
What would you give me if I don't mention MaccyD again (by name or sly reference) in relation to Adkins performance, no matter what the provocation, for the rest of the season?
Credit.
Tempting, but no ta.
SPARTA wrote:
A £10 Waitrose voucher.
A £10 Waitrose voucher and a £5 Megastore voucher if you never mention his name again?
Not tempting in the least.