by Sanguine » 06 Aug 2025 09:34
by Sutekh » 06 Aug 2025 10:40
Sanguine Strange position Liverpool find themselves in where they have had a brilliant transfer window yet still have arguably two big gaps to fill. They need another centre-back - albeit movement expected on Guehi by the end of the window. And they need another forward - they actually really need to get the Isak deal done, with Diaz gone, Nunez on his way to Al-Hilal (after looking sharp in pre-season), and Jota.
Some rumours that Liverpool are planning a move for Parma's Giovanni Leoni if the Guehi transfer looks impossible - but they are wildly different propositions, Leoni only 18 and having only handfuls of senior games to his name. Nathan Collins mentioned too - but he has just been made Brentford captain.
Ekitike looked electric against Bilbao.
by Sanguine » 06 Aug 2025 16:14
by BRO_BOT » 06 Aug 2025 16:21
Sanguine Nunez to Al-Hilal agreed, pending personal terms, which shouldn't be a problem. Elliott to RB Leipzig a distinct possibility.
Reading that if those two go through, Liverpool's net spend this window would be just £45m including if they signed Isak.
by Sutekh » 06 Aug 2025 19:31
BRO_BOTSanguine Nunez to Al-Hilal agreed, pending personal terms, which shouldn't be a problem. Elliott to RB Leipzig a distinct possibility.
Reading that if those two go through, Liverpool's net spend this window would be just £45m including if they signed Isak.
Oh, to be a well-run club again! Fergie made a 'net profit' in his final five years at Utd.
If you're successful, you can offload players that don't fit future plans for decent money
or...
...if you're not, you get lumbered with shite on huge contracts that nobody wants!
by Sanguine » 07 Aug 2025 08:59
BRO_BOTSanguine Nunez to Al-Hilal agreed, pending personal terms, which shouldn't be a problem. Elliott to RB Leipzig a distinct possibility.
Reading that if those two go through, Liverpool's net spend this window would be just £45m including if they signed Isak.
Oh, to be a well-run club again! Fergie made a 'net profit' in his final five years at Utd.
If you're successful, you can offload players that don't fit future plans for decent money
or...
...if you're not, you get lumbered with shite on huge contracts that nobody wants!
by Sanguine » 07 Aug 2025 09:00
Sutekh
Plus Liverpool manage to get “buy back” clauses into some of the contracts of the players they sell
by Whore Jackie » 07 Aug 2025 12:30
SanguineSutekh
Plus Liverpool manage to get “buy back” clauses into some of the contracts of the players they sell
They've also covered Diaz leaving Bayern for Saudi Arabia with a sell-on clause. Hughes/Edwards looking like some partnership.
From inside Bayern, there is quiet recognition that the Luis Díaz transfer was orchestrated entirely on Liverpool’s terms, with Bayern left to follow along. Richard Hughes controlled the negotiations from start to finish, setting the framework early and never letting go of the upper hand. On Bayern’s side, Jan-Christian Dreesen led the talks but lacked the authority, leverage, or instinct to shape the deal in any meaningful way. Hughes quickly secured clear signals from the Díaz entourage that the player would be open to a move to Saudi Arabia in the near future. Armed with that assurance, Liverpool insisted on a significant sell-on clause that would allow them to benefit substantially from any future transfer. Bayern, facing internal pressure to deliver a name and lacking serious alternatives, accepted the structure as it was presented.
The final agreement includes a base fee of 72 million euros, with a further 9 million in add-ons that are considered so easily achievable that the full 81 million is already being treated as a formality. With the sell-on clause factored in, the total fee Liverpool could receive may rise to 95 or even 100 million euros if a high-value transfer occurs, which is viewed internally as a likely outcome. Inside Bayern, there is no denial of how the deal played out. While the move is being presented publicly as a strong signing, those involved know exactly how the negotiations unfolded. Liverpool dictated the terms, protected their future interests, and extracted maximum value. Bayern, on the other hand, paid heavily, agreed to a structure they did not design, and came away with a player who may already be positioned for resale.
It was, in every sense, a deal done on Liverpool’s terms.
by stealthpapes » 07 Aug 2025 14:37
by Sutekh » 07 Aug 2025 14:57
Whore JackieSanguineSutekh
Plus Liverpool manage to get “buy back” clauses into some of the contracts of the players they sell
They've also covered Diaz leaving Bayern for Saudi Arabia with a sell-on clause. Hughes/Edwards looking like some partnership.
Yeah, was reading the other day about the Diaz negotiations with Bayern.From inside Bayern, there is quiet recognition that the Luis Díaz transfer was orchestrated entirely on Liverpool’s terms, with Bayern left to follow along. Richard Hughes controlled the negotiations from start to finish, setting the framework early and never letting go of the upper hand. On Bayern’s side, Jan-Christian Dreesen led the talks but lacked the authority, leverage, or instinct to shape the deal in any meaningful way. Hughes quickly secured clear signals from the Díaz entourage that the player would be open to a move to Saudi Arabia in the near future. Armed with that assurance, Liverpool insisted on a significant sell-on clause that would allow them to benefit substantially from any future transfer. Bayern, facing internal pressure to deliver a name and lacking serious alternatives, accepted the structure as it was presented.
The final agreement includes a base fee of 72 million euros, with a further 9 million in add-ons that are considered so easily achievable that the full 81 million is already being treated as a formality. With the sell-on clause factored in, the total fee Liverpool could receive may rise to 95 or even 100 million euros if a high-value transfer occurs, which is viewed internally as a likely outcome. Inside Bayern, there is no denial of how the deal played out. While the move is being presented publicly as a strong signing, those involved know exactly how the negotiations unfolded. Liverpool dictated the terms, protected their future interests, and extracted maximum value. Bayern, on the other hand, paid heavily, agreed to a structure they did not design, and came away with a player who may already be positioned for resale.
It was, in every sense, a deal done on Liverpool’s terms.
Getting €15m for Tyler Morton and £35m for Quansah is insane. Richard Hughes, the next Nicky Hammond.
by BRO_BOT » 19 Aug 2025 12:29
by Silver Fox » 19 Aug 2025 12:37
by BRO_BOT » 19 Aug 2025 13:45
Silver Fox What is there to say? A Liverpool fan did a racism, the club dealt with it swiftly. I assume you're here to applaud their efforts?
by From Despair To Where? » 20 Aug 2025 12:19
Silver Fox What is there to say? A Liverpool fan did a racism, the club dealt with it swiftly. I assume you're here to applaud their efforts?
by South Coast Royal » 25 Aug 2025 15:52
by Ascotexgunner » 25 Aug 2025 16:23
by Sutekh » 25 Aug 2025 16:30
South Coast Royal For all the attacking options open to him ,Slot has a selection problem for the game at Newcastle tonight.
Frimpong is unfit and both Gomez and Bradley are thought to be not at 100%.
His choice of Endo to play there the other day in the second half didn't work.
Curtis Jones has filled in there a couple of times but not that successfully, not being the strongest of tacklers.
Szboszlai played there a couple of times in pre-season friendlies but can be a bit reckless in the tackle.
My choice would be Andy Robertson, a proper full-back albeit very left-footed but an experienced defender who has played there for small parts of games when Trent has moved across to take a corner on the left (idiot commentators sometimes suggesting that the full-backs had been switched permanently).
There have been some really good games between these two ,not least the 4-3 when Collymore scored the decider very late on and effectively put paid to Keegan's challenge for the title and there is the slight under-current of a transfer issue between the two clubs(I mention this in case posters haven't heard about it ):wink: .
by Sutekh » 25 Aug 2025 16:40
Ascotexgunner God I hate Liverpool and their pathetic plastic fanbase.
They really are obnoxious bunch.
Proclaiming Slot as the new Messiah when in fact noone turned up last season....and it was Klopps team.
He really didn't have tweak anything. Let's see what he does now.
Then a few weeks I'm getting videos recommended of their fans saying they are gonna piss the league and no club has ever had a transfer window like theirs.
Enter Arsenal....a completed jigsaw that has had a Stormer of a transfer window and look serious contenders. I still think City and Chelsea have quietly gone about their business as well and will have a say...hopefully anyone but Liverpool to win the league.
Also I don't know how the "secret" fans above are claiming a 45m net spend......even with Isak.....
Their current expenditure is 303million Euros and 196million Euros as income......a net spend of over 100mill Euros without the addons included.....
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk and 62 guests