by Cureton's Volley » 14 Aug 2013 22:23
by Ian Royal » 14 Aug 2013 23:26
Hoop Blah wrote:Even when we've been playing 2 upfront Le Fondre has failed to make one of those positions his own.
by Hoop Blah » 16 Aug 2013 12:25
Ian Royal wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:Even when we've been playing 2 upfront Le Fondre has failed to make one of those positions his own.
I maintain he's not had an opportunity yet when we've had a side that's actually been providing decent service, with a decent partner and competing on an even vaguely level playing field.
by floyd__streete » 16 Aug 2013 12:49
Ian Royal wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:Even when we've been playing 2 upfront Le Fondre has failed to make one of those positions his own.
I maintain he's not had an opportunity yet when we've had a side that's actually been providing decent service, with a decent partner and competing on an even vaguely level playing field.
by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2013 12:51
floyd__streete wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:Even when we've been playing 2 upfront Le Fondre has failed to make one of those positions his own.
I maintain he's not had an opportunity yet when we've had a side that's actually been providing decent service, with a decent partner and competing on an even vaguely level playing field.
Pay attention m8 - we've been playing a lone striker this season under our gr8 new manager.
We still need a new striker - have we got one yet?
by Rollerbob » 19 Aug 2013 15:27
by Norfolk Royal » 19 Aug 2013 15:57
by Ian Royal » 19 Aug 2013 15:59
Norfolk Royal wrote:Adkins seems to casually avoid the fact that two of the goals were scored by a player who is now done for the season on that front.
by NewCorkSeth » 19 Aug 2013 16:01
Norfolk Royal wrote:Adkins seems to casually avoid the fact that two of the goals were scored by a player who is now done for the season on that front.
by Dave the rave » 19 Aug 2013 16:32
by NewCorkSeth » 19 Aug 2013 16:37
Dave the rave wrote:As I said on another thread I have it on good authority from the mouth of Mr Samuelson that we are looking specifically at a striker but no name forthcoming.
by Barry the bird boggler » 19 Aug 2013 16:42
Dave the rave wrote:As I said on another thread I have it on good authority from the mouth of Mr Samuelson that we are looking specifically at a striker but no name forthcoming.
by maffff » 19 Aug 2013 16:47
NewCorkSeth wrote:Dave the rave wrote:As I said on another thread I have it on good authority from the mouth of Mr Samuelson that we are looking specifically at a striker but no name forthcoming.
I heard we are in for Zlatan "The Swedish Meatball" Ibrahimovich as PSG crumble financially. Have to get Roberts of the wage book to sign him first.
by madreadingfan » 19 Aug 2013 19:00
by Hoop Blah » 19 Aug 2013 19:47
by RoyallyFcuked » 19 Aug 2013 19:58
by thirtyyarder » 19 Aug 2013 19:59
Hoop Blah wrote:MADreadingfan just about sums it up!
Roberts coming back is a long way off yet, and when he comes back the probability is that he's not going to up to football at this level.
As for competing for 1 place up front, did you not notice we played with two forwards, plus Drenthe, on Saturday.
by Ian Royal » 19 Aug 2013 20:04
thirtyyarder wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:MADreadingfan just about sums it up!
Roberts coming back is a long way off yet, and when he comes back the probability is that he's not going to up to football at this level.
As for competing for 1 place up front, did you not notice we played with two forwards, plus Drenthe, on Saturday.
I wanted to ask about this but was too intimidated by all the big boys on the the other thread. How exactly did we line up on sat? Was it a 451 or a 442? Which side was Blackman on?
by thirtyyarder » 19 Aug 2013 20:18
Ian Royal wrote:thirtyyarder wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:MADreadingfan just about sums it up!
Roberts coming back is a long way off yet, and when he comes back the probability is that he's not going to up to football at this level.
As for competing for 1 place up front, did you not notice we played with two forwards, plus Drenthe, on Saturday.
I wanted to ask about this but was too intimidated by all the big boys on the the other thread. How exactly did we line up on sat? Was it a 451 or a 442? Which side was Blackman on?
Looked pretty fluid to me with the forward players playing fairly loose positions, Drenthe usually a bit deeper and ALF and Blackman drifting out wide as necessary. A sort of 4-3-1-2 maybe.
by RoyalBlue » 19 Aug 2013 20:35
thirtyyarder wrote:Hoop Blah wrote:MADreadingfan just about sums it up!
Roberts coming back is a long way off yet, and when he comes back the probability is that he's not going to up to football at this level.
As for competing for 1 place up front, did you not notice we played with two forwards, plus Drenthe, on Saturday.
I wanted to ask about this but was too intimidated by all the big boys on the the other thread. How exactly did we line up on sat? Was it a 451 or a 442? Which side was Blackman on?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 740 guests